Marko the Munchkinwrangler sums up the social effects of prohibitions in the most eloquent way.
- Send email to Oleg Volk.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Marc Spector on Floating
- Sarah Mae on Many faces of one Casey.
- Oleg Volk on Various Henry guns
- David B on Various Henry guns
- Henry Sutter on Project Appleseed
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- April 2023
- November 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- June 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- 0
Categories
- advice requested
- ammunition
- armor
- art
- author
- beast
- book
- camera and lens
- cat
- civil rights
- computing
- craft
- dangerous
- economics
- flowers
- food
- green
- holster
- hoster
- humor
- hunting
- interesting people
- knife
- light/laser
- nature
- nude
- pet
- pink
- pistol
- portrait
- prey
- red
- rifle
- rkba
- self-defense
- shotgun
- sound suppressor
- tools
- training
- travel
- Uncategorized
- weapon
- wordpress
Meta
At least one prohibition hit a roadblock today.
http://www.sj-r.com/breaking/x65613522/Federal-court-strikes-down-ban-on-concealed-carry-in-Illinois
Larry,
I read that decision. It looks to me like the judge isn’t so much requiring that they make concealed carry legal, he is just requiring them to allow SOME FORM of outside-your-house carry (either open or concealed). Expect the hoops one has to jump through to get a permit to do so to be nearly impossible, and the penalties for messing up to be severe. Illinois politics is dominated by Chicago.
Meanwhile, here in Florida, we will be reaching 1 MILLION active CC permits very soon. And the blood in the streets is reaching knee deep… not.
s
How much can you hate a plant?
In the case of poison ivy, quite a bit.
“How much can you hate a plant?”
Enough to be a vegetarian?
I hate certain plants a little bit (we have a rather nasty, spiny weed that forms thick matts along the ground, we call tarweed, here in the inland Northwest for example. Hurts like hell if you walk into it with exposed skin, and the little spines break off in you) but far more than I hate that I love liberty. So hands off, bro., and leave my neighbors alone, or we’re gonna have a problem.
I once brought up the idea of legalization to my grandfather. He shouted “Might as well make MURDER legal!”
wow… I guess you can hate a plant A LOT.
s
“Might as well make MURDER legal!”
Some people are totally unaware, or blind, to the difference between a personal choice (like using pot) and a rights violation (like theft or murder). That is one of our biggest problems on Earth.
HAHA!!!!! Granddad WAS blind (literally).
I don’t think that had anything to do with his hatred of the weed. I always wondered just why he felt that way but was never able to have a sane, calm conversation on the subject with him. He hated it that much. He’s gone now (earlier this year) so I guess I’ll never have the chance.
s
Ditchweed was originally the drug of choice for blacks, musicians, and conterculture types during the early part of the 20th Century.
Carefully examine the lyrics for “One Toke Over the Line”.
Old farts with a hate on for hippies, jazz musicians, and blacks got completely on board with prohibiting weed as a means of preserving public morality.
Hi oleg.
Wanted to say you thanks for your photos, as a starting photographer i use a lot of your photographs as reference and inspiration, well in Italy, even if we are the land of Beretta, we can’t use and have weapons freely like in the us, so i’ll stick to airsoft for now.
Btw
Keep it up and great job!
sincerely
Federico
Federico,
How about percussion arms, such as the beautiful reproductions of Colt and Remington percussion revolvers of the 1860s, made in Italy by such companies as Uberti, Pietta, et al? Are those restricted as modern firearms?
Yep, everything that shoots at more than 1 joule is considered “weapon” And people 18+ are allowed to buy without license only the 7.5 joule airguns like diana etc.
any other firearm can only be purchased by licence:
To get a firearm detention licence you have to:
Be 18+
Get a medical and psychological check
Go to national shooting range and take a gun safety course
200€ and six months later you can have your weapons
every 5 years you have to re-do the medical and psycological check.
THIS if you are buying them just to keep them in home and shooting at the range.
If you want to use them for hunting you have to pay like 1000€ of taxes every year + med/psico check every year
If you want them for Self-defence (taking them around) well you can’t: If you want to protect your shop then you have to give them a good reason like: i’m a jeweller or i move a lot of moneys, I have the shop in a ghetto-like place or in a very isolated place etc. AND you have to give them the exact route you use to bring you and your weapon from house to shop and never go out from that route with your weapon with you.
In italy there is a really shitty self-defense rule: If the thief have a knife i can’t shoot him, i have to take him down with a knife or inferior weapon (or just scare him with my gun if i can): there are a lot of jewellers beaten almost to death that shoot at their offenders (without killing them), and got a lot of trouble with the law
If he runs i can’t shoot him at the bag, if the thief have a toy gun, and i shoot him, well i’m in deep shit.
The only ones who can bring around their weapons (between civilians) are the security guards, that have a specific license
Sorry for my english.
Also, not firearm but if you want to take around a knife you have to put it in a place where it can take you at least 5-10 seconds to take them out, like in a bag.
Yes, pretty easy life for muggers and thief here…
Forgot to mention:
Police give you the route to take from home to shooting range and you can’t go out from it
Automatic weapons are forbidden, they are considered “War weapons” so only military can have them.
Hate weed? No, but I happen to be risk adverse to a sane degree, and so I want to see users of all intoxicants have a limit so that the public doesn’t have to absorb more risk, and I want to see that limit enforced.
As we all know, there IS such a limit for the intoxicant ethyl alcohol. There are badly-enforced restrictions on intoxicating pharmaceuticals, but they ARE written and could be enforced.
Interesting to note that in Oregon, one of the first Medical Cannabis states, there is no nanogram limit for THC in the blood. None. At least when WA passed their de-criminalization of cannabis, they put a nanogram limit on it, and everyone voted for it up there anyway, but now they are putting up a mighty whine that more than a couple of bong hits put users over the limit, and probably MOST medical cannabis users are over the limit all the time. Being over the limit, of course, means you can’t operate a motor vehicle on the public roads.
Seems curious to me that MADD, SADD, none of them are making the slightest fuss about high drivers like they do about having even one ounce of liquor and then driving. Could the fix be in there?
The science of use is not there for users of cannabis. With alcohol, the strength of alcohol by volume is there for all to see, so you know just how much alcohol you are getting. If you brew your own, you can still measure the alcohol and do the arithmetic.
With cannabis, the amount of THC in it is all over the map, and also the method of intake radically changes the amount of THC that the body absorbs. There is currently no way to know how high you really are, because a THC blood test has to be done by a medical lab, there is no field test which the cannabis user can do.
In the newly-legal states, you will have a lot of new users, and one user just killed a pedestrian in Vancouver WA yesterday. Driving a car is nothing like blowing a good jazz horn.
Clearly the zero-aggression principle (http://www.down-with-power.com/0-zap.html) requires that you respect the rights of others when you do things to yourself. That means not endangering them.
So what’s the conclusion? Setting specific limits is one, but that’s limited to the specific intoxicants that regulators have though of. It also assumes that everyone is equally affected by a given blood level, which is unlikely to be true. It also ignores other impairment (asleep, distracted).
A general “driving while impaired” rule, tested with something similar to the classic “field sobriety test”, should work better.
Strawman argument, Rivrdog. No one here is advocating driving while intoxicated.
People also commit manslaughter when they get behind the wheel dead drunk as well.
I do not care what the means of intoxication is.
If you drive while intoxicated, you need to be removed from any highway I use. Preferably in some manner that involves a great deal of pain, expense, and embarrassment.
I don’t hat e the plant I hate the morons that use it and lie about it and defend it.
No, my rights are not volated because some idiot or stupid kid cant smoke pot. as noted above, pot was an intoxicant that came from the gutter and contrary to the brainless kids and failed liberal soc ial experiments – it should have stayed there. Stupidity like this discredits the lib rtarians – which is unfortunate because the bulk of their creed has merit. anyone that advocates the legalization of drugs is an idiot and no bones about it.