No substitute for intelligence?

deer_1282

In reading various research about the role of intelligence for setting and achieving life goals, I see numerous arguments for its preeminence. At first, it seems that no substitutes exist, but I see one quality which appears to compensate at least partially for insufficient IQ: playing well with others. A peaceful, cooperative person will do far better even with minimal cognitive ability than a slightly smarter but anti-social, unfriendly individual. Considering that, parents would do well to teach the value of cooperative behavior to the kids — not in the sense of unfailingly following cultural protocol but in trying to figure out how to make every interaction profitable to all parties. Comparative advantage is a social as well as an economic concept, and a peaceable person attaching himself to smarter friends would do better than a brigand trying to prey on his intellectual superiors.

This entry was posted in interesting people. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to No substitute for intelligence?

  1. James says:

    However, especially at higher IQ percentiles, being a bit (or more) of a dick, when appropriate (measured by personal utility, not moral code) is a reproductively powerful trait.

    • Y. says:

      By that do you mean that women are often subconsciously attracted to behaviors that signal superior social status, such as aloofness, arrogance or disdain for social norms?

      • James says:

        Not only that.

        When combined with capability, moral flexibility. willingness to exploit social norms, etc, are traits that can ensure success.

  2. Y. says:

    I believe this is called ‘social intelligence’ and it’s importance has been noted in the past. Even some books on the subject, though I believe they oversold the concept a little.

    Nevertheless, especially in the situations where cooperation is required, being able to work smoothly with others without having to resort to threats and force is of vital importance.

    It should be noted though that social predators exist who exploit the basic ‘niceness’ and helpfulness of the majority.

    Comparative advantage is a social as well as an economic concept, and a peaceable person attaching himself to smarter friends would do better than a brigand trying to prey on his intellectual superiors.

    Humans are generally overconfident and overestimate their own abilities. In addition, humility is not as a desirable quality in people these days.

  3. Pingback: Two From Oleg Volk | Western Rifle Shooters Association

  4. knuckdm says:

    Humility comes only to those who have true confidence. “Oh Lord, it’s hard to be humble,when you’re perfect in every way.”

  5. Tony Lekas says:

    With determination, persistence, and the willingness to work hard a person of lower intelligence may be able to accomplish more than an intelligent person without those traits.

Comments are closed.