I am trying to visualize a flying species with three eyes instead of two. My guess is that it would improve altitude perception as well as depth. Does anyone know of research of theoretical functionality of three eyes?
- Send email to Oleg Volk.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Marc Spector on Floating
- Sarah Mae on Many faces of one Casey.
- Oleg Volk on Various Henry guns
- David B on Various Henry guns
- Henry Sutter on Project Appleseed
Archives
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- April 2023
- November 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- June 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- 0
Categories
- advice requested
- ammunition
- armor
- art
- author
- beast
- book
- camera and lens
- cat
- civil rights
- computing
- craft
- dangerous
- economics
- flowers
- food
- green
- holster
- hoster
- humor
- hunting
- interesting people
- knife
- light/laser
- nature
- nude
- pet
- pink
- pistol
- portrait
- prey
- red
- rifle
- rkba
- self-defense
- shotgun
- sound suppressor
- tools
- training
- travel
- Uncategorized
- weapon
- wordpress
Meta
Forty years ago the xenobiology department at MIT was playing with this (back when Asminov ran it).
Two eyes generally give stereoscopic vision, which seems sufficient for the tangible environment. I’ve only heard of third eyes in relation to the vision/perception of extra dimensionalities. Usually, as with some beliefs on this planet, such is used for ‘seeing’ into the minds/souls of others. If one believes is such, a third eye could view overlapping dimensions to the world as we know it. Usually associated with the pineal gland. Dunno if this helps any….
Thanks for sharing your oftimes interesting and entertaining blog!
I know it isn’t exactly what you asked but many flying insects have compound eyes and spiders have multiple eyes but don’t fly(thank whatever god you may believe in). Bats have eyes as well as very accurate echo location.
So the follow-up would be: would a flying species be better off with echo location plus visual plus thermal, so two pairs of dissimilar eyes (zoomed in visual, wide field thermal) plus sensitive ears? Echo location isn’t passive, so would be subject to detection by others who can hear in that range…
Oleg, read Night Walk by Bob Shaw. I first read this when it was first published around 1970. I think it is pretty dated but still entertaining and very original. You can find it on Amazon.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Night_Walk_(novel)
John Davies Spokane WA
fish have eyes on the sides, so they can see predators. But a bird can’t be shaped like a fish, because it needs to use wings to generate lift. So a cylindrical body with eyes arranged in a triangle could improve vision for predator avoidance, especially if, e.g. gravity is low enough that attacks could come from below.
Where would the 3rd eye be? If the three eyes are at the corners of an equilateral triangle then the creature could have stereoscopic vision in almost 100% of the circular field of view. If two are forward (hunter’s vision) having one facing rear to detect attacks from the rear would be an advantage…
Note that most birds are prey animals and do have eyes on the sides of their heads. IIRC the pigeon has two binocular fields: directly in front, and directly to the rear of the head, each eye has about 190 degree field of view.
Hmm, yeah; a pit viper with compound eyes (thermal through ultraviolet) plus echo location would be…unlikely but formidable. If you want to go all scifi, there’s the fact that everywhere there are radio frequency EM waves which might be exploited in detecting prey. It is said that sharks and dolphins employ something like that. Detecting the electrical fields generated by prey is one thing, but the other possibility is detecting the disturbances in the ambient radio frequency background caused by the movements of prey.
Two eyes are enough for depth perception. A third would be useful for seeing behind the animal, to prevent ambush.