Michael Kassnar of Trans World Arms holds the semi-auto Tavor. An improved version of it will be produced in the US later this year. I really like that the field-stripping yields just two major sub-assemblies without any loose small parts.
- Send email to Oleg Volk.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Marc Spector on Floating
- Sarah Mae on Many faces of one Casey.
- Oleg Volk on Various Henry guns
- David B on Various Henry guns
- Henry Sutter on Project Appleseed
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- April 2023
- November 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- June 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- 0
Categories
- advice requested
- ammunition
- armor
- art
- author
- beast
- book
- camera and lens
- cat
- civil rights
- computing
- craft
- dangerous
- economics
- flowers
- food
- green
- holster
- hoster
- humor
- hunting
- interesting people
- knife
- light/laser
- nature
- nude
- pet
- pink
- pistol
- portrait
- prey
- red
- rifle
- rkba
- self-defense
- shotgun
- sound suppressor
- tools
- training
- travel
- Uncategorized
- weapon
- wordpress
Meta
Unfortunately I’m disappointing at the 26″ OAL and only a 16″ barrel, especially when compared to the RFB’s 26″ OAL and an 18″ barrel in 308. You’d think they could easily have done a 5.56 with a 18-20″ barrel and kept the OAL at 26″.
18″ barrel might work better. On the other hand, I plan on sound suppressing mine and would prefer the shortest legally possible barrel to keep the balance reasonable. Fragmentation range of M855 ball is irrelevant to me as I’d use controlled expansion bullets and, in any case, self-defense ranges are usually well below either 150 or 175m.
But if you can get more barrel in the same OAL, why not?
Also, wouldn’t a longer barrel help in silencing, as more of the gas’ energy ends up in the projectile? The effect is probably marginal at best, but I keep coming back to if it has to be 26″ why not have a longer barrel if you can do so.
It likely boils down to ergonomics — they CAN put the action so far back that the back of the magazine is within an inch of buttplate, but that would be highly impractical for a number of reasons, among them being that it would almost certainly be ejecting into you, which would affect reliability and shooter comfort, and that on top of making changing magazines much more difficult.
They could move the magazine forward relative to the chamber, ala the Boberg XR9 that’s been featured on this blog, or a number of machineguns before that.
Could do that….but then we’d not be able to use AR15 mags.
Oh, it would still be possible, but more complicated. Haven’t given it overwhelming amounts of thought, but I suppose you’d probably have an extension of the bolt strip rounds out of the magazine and load them into an intermediate stage, similar to a single-round tubular magazine, and then on the next cycle, strip it out and load it. Advantage would be that there would actually be a round in the rifle, even if you drop the magazine when empty. Disadvantage (aside from added complexity) would be that, if you shot all the way dry, you’d have to cycle it twice in order to chamber a round. I bet there are other solutions, as well, but I doubt any of them are simple.
You could certainly make them function with lightly-modified AR magazines, and probably have those magazines be reverse-compatible with other firearms, even if standard AR mags would not be compatible with yours.
Oleg,
Love the “bullpup” design. With regards to the 12 ga. bullpup, any chance of a semi-auto version?
Mozart
That I do not know.
Pingback: SayUncle » Gun Porn
This Tavor is surprisingly clean and polished 😉
The ones I usually see in crowd are dusty and covered with scratches.
@Chris…. Thirty Round STANAG Mags that far back in the chassis would be awkward at best… Especially prone… This is a battle rifle, and they aren’t going to change the design… You either like it or not… Holding your breath until KelTech makes a 5.56 RFB and makes it actually available to the public will be an exercise in futility… IMI has cranked out enough of these that they are actually exporting them beyond their homeland contracts… Food for thought…
Pingback: Gun Porn | My Blog
Absolutely, am so ready for that exact version to come out. I DO WANT!!!! Bad!!!