The logic of 300BLK is simple: twice the weight of metal at the cost of slightly less flat trajectory. At 100 yards, the difference in drop is only 2″, at 200 it grows to 8″. Still within point blank for a human opponent. The benefit is greater penetration and larger wound channel. Since most defensive rifles are used up close, seems like a good trade to me.
- Send email to Oleg Volk.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Marc Spector on Floating
- Sarah Mae on Many faces of one Casey.
- Oleg Volk on Various Henry guns
- David B on Various Henry guns
- Henry Sutter on Project Appleseed
Archives
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- April 2023
- November 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- June 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- 0
Categories
- advice requested
- ammunition
- armor
- art
- author
- beast
- book
- camera and lens
- cat
- civil rights
- computing
- craft
- dangerous
- economics
- flowers
- food
- green
- holster
- hoster
- humor
- hunting
- interesting people
- knife
- light/laser
- nature
- nude
- pet
- pink
- pistol
- portrait
- prey
- red
- rifle
- rkba
- self-defense
- shotgun
- sound suppressor
- tools
- training
- travel
- Uncategorized
- weapon
- wordpress
Meta
Why not stick to 7.62×39?
300 blk can be used in a standard AR – same mags, same lower, same upper(!) – the *ONLY* thing that changes is the bbl.
From a .mil logistics perspective, this is spectacular – no need to scrap hundreds of billions in inventory!
It even uses the same BRASS as 5.56/223 – it’s just necked to a different bullet size!
X39 OTOH would require new mags at a minimum, and IIRc new b/c’s, in addition to the bbl. New brass-factories would have to be set up… `
Part of the design intent of the .300 blk is to use the existing AR platform. The 7.62×39 can’t because the round requires a greater magazine curvature than the AR magazine well can handle. Otherwise, the weapon will feed like an anorexic bulemic with prom one week away, i.e., “not well, not very well at all.”
As noted above, same lower, same upper, same mags, same BCG and bolt. Change the barrel and voila!
This cartridge make most sense in a suppressed rifle. Terminal ballistics, the bullet needs to tumble to be effective since it does not go fast enough to expand.
You have to be careful with it. Some guy once inadvertently stuck his mag with .300 Whisper into his other AR chambered in .223. The Sierra 240gr Matchking makes a VERY long bullet when swaged down to .22 caliber (there was a picture, Precision Shooting magazine). Kinda hard on the gun, too.
i hunt to kinds of deer mule deer in the hi desert and black tail deer in the moniuatns .i like a long flat shooting gun for mule deer like a 7mm remington mag,270win.338win mag . all can be hard on the deer . all big guns most with hi recoil for a new or small shooter. in the mt i like a small lite brush gun like a 243win, 308win -7.62 nato , 300 savage i have even let my wife shoot a 223 remington to small some say but the last deer she shot dropped like it was hit my a mack truck i aways say start small the 243 win is the most popular with most deer hunters cheap to shot and you can buy ammo anywhere