Thoughts on school shootings

1. Mass murderers who plan on killing themselves after the spree are not deterred by posthumous legal penalties. Really. Trying to disarm everyone who can theoretically snap is impossible — witness the Russian cops doing mass shootings against the disarmed population.

2. Mandatory lock-downs deny escape to those whose only hope is being a swift and difficult target. Interior doors usually have glass sections and do little to stop armed intruders.

3. At the colleges where I taught in the past decade, about 25% of the teachers and engineering school students carried pistols, up to 10% of the graphic design students. When VT shooting happened, a co-worker said “Thank god our students carry! If this crap happens here, we can hide behind them.” Granted, I wasn’t teaching at a K-12, but the same reasoning applies to them. In a typical school with a hundred or more staff and teachers, it’s likely that a half-dozen armed first responders are on site, and at least one of them would be close enough to fight back.

This entry was posted in civil rights, rkba, self-defense, training, weapon. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Thoughts on school shootings

  1. cmblake6 says:

    This is linked over at mine. Well, actually I just linked the site, not just the post. The post I stole the picture from. The question to ask is, if you can’t have a gun why not have at least a well balanced knife to throw?

    • Paul Koning says:

      (a) because throwing your weapon at your attacker is risky, (b) because throwing a knife accurately is very hard, (c) because stopping an attack with a knife, especially if you’re a small and not very strong defender, is chancy, (d) because the gun-banners generally ban weapons of any kind, at least they do in Massachusetts, (e) and so on.
      Then again, knives are a fine last chance backup. I’ve been thinking of getting one of these:

Comments are closed.