A-tacs camo works pretty well.

This Tavor uses a Gear Head Works forend that holds any 1″ light or laser (a Primary Arms tactical light with tape switch in this instance).

The suppressor looks big because it’s a YHM .308 can mounted on a .223 rifle as a field expedient. Large internal volume compensated for a larger opening pretty well.

The optic is a Burris 1-4x XTR-14 with illuminated horseshoe reticle.

Despite being highlighted by selective focus, the a-tacs patterned (by BAM Customs) rifle and uniform still blend in the background quite well. In dappled forest light, this guy was nearly invisible.

Posted in interesting people, rifle, sound suppressor, weapon | Tagged , , , , | 9 Comments

Strange Networked Blogs messages.

Just got a message asking to request blog ownership confirmation from friends. I recall that was done back when I first syndicated the blog, but why now? Any ideas?

Posted in advice requested | 3 Comments

Iron sights for the win!

SU16A with ten-round magazine inserted and two more in the stock. Inserted magazine can be replaced with any AR magazine, and stock can hold an additional GI 30-rounder.

Keltec SU16A is an excellent example of .223 “light rifle” with 18.5″ barrel and long sight radius. Tech Sight peep improves on factory with repeatable adjustments, sight radius extended to 18.75″ and two apertures for short/long range. With M855 (62gr) ammunition, the lower aperture gives 25/300yard zero and the higher aperture just over 450 yards. This covers the realistic effective range of the rifle/cartridge combination for defense or hunting.

At five pounds, SU16A fits the niche originally targeted by M1 carbine — with much extended range and improved ballistic performance. The newest iteration shown here have a metal front sight tower with protective wings instead of the hood, both for better durability and improved sight picture.

Posted in rifle | Tagged , , | 7 Comments

A baker’s dozen of 45s.

Metro Arms 3011 SSD Tactical

Posted in pistol, weapon | Tagged | 5 Comments

PMR30 with Burris Fast Dot

PMR30 is a very flat-shooting pistol. A red dot sight lets the user take advantage of the extended ballistic range with better accuracy.

Posted in interesting people, pistol, self-defense, weapon | Tagged , | 5 Comments

A very tight M1911

I like the grip texture — subtle but conducive to retention on recoil. The pistol itself is made to rather close clearances and feels very tight. Original-style guide rod, crisp trigger. Made by Metro Arms.

Posted in pistol, self-defense, weapon | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Armed reader

She’s reading “Knowing Guns” (written by Stu Chisholm and illustrated by me). The pistol is a Metro Arms American Classic II in a Vega holster.

Posted in book, interesting people, pistol | Tagged , , | 8 Comments

Austin, TX and Orlando, FL roll call

I will be going to Austin and Orlando later this year. If you are in or near those cities and would like to connect during my visit, please let me know.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 13 Comments

Alternate history bifurication point?

With some minor but plausible changes on the Austrian side, could Prussia have lost the Sadowa battle in 1866? And, had they lost it, could it have ended their claim to preeminence among the German states, along with the ability to take on France in 1871? How would that world have looked by 1914?

Or was the Prussian advantage in rail communications and small arms too decisive for the more minor factors to have prevailed?

Posted in book | Tagged , | 4 Comments

From empty hand to full in a second

Ruger LC9 with Viridian Reactor R5 resided in a holster corset. Very quick and allows for discreet carry of fairly large pistols (up to G19 or 3.5″ M1911).

Posted in holster, pistol, rkba, self-defense | Tagged , , | 6 Comments

Grafitti

One of my photos showed up as a street drawing somewhere in Pennsylvania (?)

Posted in rifle | 3 Comments

Price comparisons

Just an idle thought: from 1900 to 1933, US dollar was worth roughly a pennyweight (1/20 troy ounce or 1.556 gram) of gold. As of today, gold trades for just under $43/gram. A dollar today buys about 67 times less gold than it did in 1925. Do we earn 67 times more? A more meaningful comparison would be to the wages and prices of the day.

In 1924, a typical farm wage was a little less than $50/month, or a little over $44K annually in today’s money. Skilled trades (numbers for unionized workers in NYC, therefore not typical of the rest of the country) were four to six times higher. Another source listed average income under $100/month — I am sure that these numbers varied greatly with location and other factors.  I am not sure how the linked site came up with the 1:12.48 ratio — for that to be accurate, the purchasing power of gold had to be 5.3 times lower than today.

For new technologies, like radios, that was more than true. A good radio with a speaker approached $100 — imagine how much technology $6700 buy us today! Cars were still a luxury, but an entry level vehicle (Ford Model T) could be had for about $260 — the gold equivalent of $17420 in today’s money.  Alcohol was almost unobtainable by legal channels due to the prohibition. Meat, dairy, most fruit were far more expensive once transported — but became very cheap in season or near the producers. The FDA had not choked the local food production quite as badly back then.

Imported goods were far fewer back then and heavily taxed. Tariffs could reach 40-60%, making quality European products unaffordable for many. Income tax wasn’t even a concern for most people, but property taxes were a problem for many, especially later in the decade.

The sum of this comparison is that the 1920s were a fairly prosperous decade even by today’s standards, a bit like 1990s from the perspective of today. Technological advances make direct comparisons difficult, but it’s my impression that government “cures” of economic downturns , now and in the 1930s, were extremely counter-productive and also detrimental to economic and social freedoms. The censorship and intimidation practiced by the FDR administration are again in vogue today. A 1920s American did face certain problems that are minimized today (such as government discrimination by race) but was also able to buy a machine gun or dynamite unimpeded. Certain freedoms, such as almost unrestricted travel, did go out with World War One, but many others have been lost since.

Posted in civil rights, food, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 5 Comments

Uzi loaded with tracers

Wherever he is, John Galt probably prefers a weapon with more range. The Uzi, especially with the solid wooden stock, does work all right to about 100 meters.

A little more forward lean would have been nice, but it worked out well enough.

Being able to correct aim by observation of tracers really helps. SBR tracers used here are still available. I think they are an excellent investment for training. Standard range tracers work to 75-100m, extended range to about 200.

Posted in ammunition, rkba, self-defense, weapon | Tagged , , , , | 9 Comments

Just a portrait of a Dusseldorf man

Inspired by my friend’s blog.

Posted in interesting people | Tagged , | 2 Comments

A small but neat human.

I seldom connect with very young kids. This one, my niece, has enough personality at age one to actually be interesting.

Posted in interesting people | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

The inexplicable ban on purely defensive guns

The two derringers she’s holding are chambered in .22 Short. They through a 27-29gr bullets at about 700fps, enough for 6-8 inches of penetration in flesh. Due to the minimal sights, they can be aimed reliably only at a fairly short range, perhaps half-dozen steps. Reloading is done manually and isn’t very quick.

These guns can be used as offensive weapons, but even a medium-sized knife is likely to be more effective for killing somebody. A person threatened with one can likely escape being hit by running away. Despite the minimal power and range of these pistols, they are treated the same as a full-size .45 by the US authorities. In Russia, even people who can own 12ga shotguns — nearly 50 times more powerful — cannot own these for self-defense unless they are special people, friends of the government. Much the same situation obtains in New York City, where only special people get gun licenses and official permission to carry. Given that these are unsuitable to offensive use, why would they be as restricted as full-power sidearms?

Given the light weight and the small size, these can be easily concealed. Even an infirm defender can lift and fire them, providing a last-ditch option against criminals. A single shot of low power won’t likely cause a fatal injury, but we know from observation that most violent criminals flee as soon as the likelihood of  any injury at all exceeds zero.

So the best guess is that restricting acquisition and carry of even the last potent firearms serves the purpose of keeping as much of the population as possible less safe from crime. Certain people — typically those who seek power of the public office — prefer their electorate to be less secure. The restrictions have nothing to do with public safety and much to do with retaining the official monopoly on force.

The woman in the photo is obviously not dressed for combat, and yet who would be willing to threaten her while she holds the two little pistols in her hands? A wheelchair-bound invalid is normally easy prey for thugs, but the vulnerability decreases a lot if the mere possibility of shooting back is introduced.  The same is true for the aged, the slightly built and for everyone else who would normally be the natural fodder of the lawless. When you talk to anti-gun people, ask them if they would be OK with the weakest of the weak arms more freely available. If they aren’t, ask why not.

Posted in pistol, rkba, self-defense, Uncategorized, weapon | Tagged , | 10 Comments

Mauser derivative

This design is a 1940s variation of an 1890s design. Nothing like the scary semi-auto rifles that the US prohibitionists fear. And yet, can you imagine them being OK with you or I having this rifle without interference?

Their end-game is less to restrict specific arms than to restrict people who aren’t them or their flunkies — in short, to expand the concept of “prohibited person” to encompass all of their political opponents and  all the neutrals. That’s how it is in other totalitarian countries: the high-ranking supporters of the ruling party get guns, the rest do not. It was that way in 1930s Italy and Germany and USSR, and it is that way in New York City now.

Posted in rifle, rkba, self-defense | Tagged , , | 10 Comments

People in love

From a recent wedding.

Posted in interesting people | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Good recoil control with M&P Shield

A novice shooter practices with her carry pistol, M&P Shield. My impression of the Shield has been quite positive — it’s accurate, has a good trigger, low felt recoil and muzzle rise, well designed magazines. No malfunctions over about 400 rounds so far. Magazines do have to be seated quite firmly when full.

Posted in pistol, self-defense, training | Tagged , | 4 Comments

Range lizard

Posted in beast | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Range lizard